Legal Opinion

Swecker v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1590Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY SWECKER and BEVERLY SWECKER, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-1590-RCL FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Gregory and Beverly Swecker ("the Sweckers") own and operate a wind turbine on their Iowa farm. The Sweckers brought this prose action against the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") 1 under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"),

Pub. L. No. 79-404, 60

Stat. 237 (1946) (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 701), and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA"), Pub. L.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API