Legal Opinion

People v. Cohan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 1996No. 96SA61PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1976. The conditional admission in this case states:

a. The respondent was granted pro hac vice status in the United States District Court for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. JaniszewskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API