Legal Opinion

People v. Janiszewski

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 28, 1995No. 95SA195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding, and the assistant disciplinary counsel, entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure for contumacious conduct during the course of a jury trial. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1985. The respondent represented the alleged father in a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ATTORNEY A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BrennanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. People v. CohanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API