Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2001No. 35,182-WCAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGaskins, J.
In this worker’s compensation case, Louisiana Pacific Corporation appeals from a judgment awarding its former em*839ployee, James D. Marshall, supplemental earnings benefits (SEB). We affirm.
FACTS
The claimant, a forklift operator, was injured in the course and scope of his employment on January 8,1998. On January 28, 1998, he was released to return to work without limitations by his treating physician. At a follow-up exam on February 18, 1998, his treating physician found that he was able to perform light duty work.
According to his employer’s termination policy, if an employee does not call in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bolton v. Mike Fleming Const.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002