Legal Opinion

Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 24, 1993No. 92-C-3081PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

619 So.2d 52 (1993)

Lawrence PINKINS, Sr.

v.

CARDINAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC. and Zurich American Insurance Company.

No. 92-C-3081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 24, 1993.

Richard A. Weigand, Dee O'Neil Andrews, Weigand, Levenson & Costa, New Orleans, for applicant.

Steven D. Oliver, Windhorst, Gaudry, Ranson, Higgins & Gremillion, Harvey, Delbert G. Talley, Covington, for respondents.

ORTIQUE, Justice.[1]

In this workers' compensation case, writ was granted to determine whether the trial court erred in finding that Lawrence Pinkins, Sr., claimant-plaintiff, was capable of returning to work in any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Lester v. Southern Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  5. Breaux v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. Guillory v. Interstate Gas StationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. Quinones v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API