Legal Opinion

Martin v. Naik

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 15, 2010No. 101,146PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

This appeal presents a couple of deceptively simple questions. First, does the statute of limitations start to run on a medical malpractice claim at the time of injury when the defendant’s conduct causes the patient to suffer a coma from which he never recovers? Second, when the patient’s heirs bring a wrongful death action following the patient’s death, is that claim barred by the statute of limitations if it is not brought within 2 years after the negligent conduct that caused the patient’s coma and eventual death? After rambling through a briar patch of somewhat confusing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Davidson v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. NaikSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Jeanes v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Mack-Evans v. Hilltop Healthcare Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dunn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. MacK-evans v. HILLTOP HEALTHCARE CENTERWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API