Legal Opinion

Bueker v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 19, 1997No. 96 C 6912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

LEFKOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants, Young’s Luxury Limousine Service and Harold Young (collectively, “Young”), have moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 37 for an order compelling Dr. George Schoedinger of St. Louis, Missouri to appear in Chicago, Illinois for the continuation of his deposition. The following facts are pertinent to the resolution of this discovery dispute.

After being injured in a motor vehicle accident, plaintiff, William Bueker, a resident of Ft. Madison, Iowa, was treated by Dr. Schoedinger in St. Louis, Missouri where Dr. Schoedinger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nemmers Ex Rel. Nemmers v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodco AutobodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dreyer v. GACS Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
  2. Costello v. PoisellaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Petition of New Hampshire Division of State PoliceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API