Legal Opinion

Costello v. Poisella

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 10, 2013No. Nos. 05c736, 05c740, 05c746, 05c764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARY M. ROWLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.

Nonparty Nisen & Elliott, LLC moves the Court to bar Defendants’ use or disclosure of two memoranda in these proceedings, which it contends are protected by the work-product privilege, find that the memoranda remain privileged, and award sanctions. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Strike is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants are former high-level employees of Comdisco, Inc., who participated in Comdisco’s shared investment plan (SIP) program by…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. The Solutions Team, Inc. v. Oak Street Health, MSO, LLC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API