Costello v. Poisella
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARY M. ROWLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.
Nonparty Nisen & Elliott, LLC moves the Court to bar Defendants’ use or disclosure of two memoranda in these proceedings, which it contends are protected by the work-product privilege, find that the memoranda remain privileged, and award sanctions. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Strike is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendants are former high-level employees of Comdisco, Inc., who participated in Comdisco’s shared investment plan (SIP) program by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- The Solutions Team, Inc. v. Oak Street Health, MSO, LLC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020