Legal Opinion

Lamb v. A. D. McKee, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 6, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This writ brings up orders of the Bergen County Court of Common Pleas, setting aside four convictions of the defendant A. D. McKee, Incorporated, for violations of the zoning ordinance of the borough of Ho-Ho-Kus.

The zoning ordinance was passed June 6th, 1923, and the Enabling act was passed in 1928. Pamph. L., p. 696. The defendant was the owner of a ten-acre lot of land in the borough, acquired in 1927. From this tract it was excavating sand and gravel, although only one. acre was being worked at that time. After the Enabling act was passed the defendant continued to make…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McCaslin v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Struyk v. Samuel Braen's SonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Town of Wolfeboro v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API