Legal Opinion
United States v. Juozas Kungys
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 20, 1986No. 83-5884PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, 517 F.Supp. 1104, Juozas Kungys, in a denaturalization proceeding, we are asked to determine whether certain undisputed misrepresentations or conceal-ments which were made by the defendant on his visa application and which were repeated in connection with his naturalization petition are material within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a) and Chaunt v. United States, 364 U.S. 350, 81 S.Ct. 147, 5 L.Ed.2d 120 (1960). Our review requires us to examine the second prong of the Chaunt test which has…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burger-Fischer v. DeGussa AgDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Reinhold Kulle v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Algimantas M. DailideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Iwan MandyczCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.