Legal Opinion

Voss v. Connecticut Mutual Life-Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1902No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by Anna Yoss and others against the Connecticut Mutual Life-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case is brought here by writ of error. The subject-matter thereof, and all the parties thereto, except Joseph Engelking, were before this court in the case of Voss v. Insurance Co., 119 Mich. 161 (77 N. W. 697, 44 L. R. A. 689). A demurrer was interposed in that case. The declaration averred that Joseph Engelking was one of the children of Katharina Engelking. The demurrer was sustained because Joseph Engelking had not been made a party. After the decision in that case, an amended declaration was filed, in which Joseph Engelking was made a plaintiff. After the testimony was all in, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Voss v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Life-Insurance v. BaslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Cornwell v. Surety Fund Life Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API