Legal Opinion

Trussell v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1951No. 17317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) As shown by our statement of the facts, the court sustained a general demurrer to and dismissed the amended petition upon the ground that it did not state a cause of action for the writ of mandamus. Concededly, all other questions presented for decision by the writ of error will become 'moot if we sustain the trial court’s ruling on the demurrer; and, for the following reasons, we are of the opinion that the court’s ruling on the demurrer was proper:(a) Mandamus will not be granted to require an illegal act to be done by a public official,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adkins v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Douglas v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Hodges v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Carter v. LandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Brown v. MinterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Kemp v. Mitchell County Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Kemp v. MITCHELL CO. DEMO. EX. COM.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  5. Veal v. Washington County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API