Harmon v. James
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. Nowhere in the petition is it alleged that the petitioner or any other person has filed, or desires to file, any application for a permit to engage in the retail sale of any of the beverages mentioned in the petition. So far as the record here discloses, such application may never be filed. “Mandamus will not be granted when, it is manifest that the writ would, for any cause, be nugatory or fruitless; nor will it be granted on mere suspicion or fear, before a refusal to act or a wrongful act done.” Code, § 64-106. In Smith v. Hodgson,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Thomas v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Adkins v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Phillips v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Smith v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Undercofler v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- City of Decatur v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- McCallum v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Crow v. McCallumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- State ex rel. Board of Public Education v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.