Legal Opinion

Teamsters Local 639-Employers Health Trust Fund v. Couplin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 6, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1835Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639— EMPLOYERS HEALTH TRUST FUND et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-1835 (CRC) v. JEROME COUPLIN, Defendant. OPINION Teamsters Local 639 operates an employee benefit plan for its members. In 2020, the plan paid medical benefits to union member Jerome Couplin following a car accident. Mr. Couplin later received worker’s compensation settlement payments for the same accident. The plan rules required Couplin to reimburse the fund. He did not do so. So the plan and its trustees filed this lawsuit against him under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boland v. ELITE TERRAZZO FLOORING, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Kaplan v. Cent. Bank of the Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Fanning v. Permanent Solution Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. United States v. $1,071,251.44 of Funds Associated With Mingzheng Int'l Trading Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Boland v. Smith & Rogers Construction L.T.D.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API