Legal Opinion

United States v. Dickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1938No. 27161. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

On December 5, 1935, Thomas Dickson borrowed $1,006.64 from the Citizens Bank of Bremerton under the terms of the Federal housing administration act (12 U. S. C. A., § 1701 et seq.) and executed a note in favor of the bank for the amount of the loan, which was payable in forty-eight equal monthly installments, the first installment to be paid January 5, 1936. Under § 1703 of the housing act, the lending bank was insured against any loss sustained by it as a result of the loan to Dickson. Ten monthly installments, the last in October, 1936, and the interest due in November and December, 1936,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. EmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MarxenSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In Re Ever Krisp Food Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Spokane v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Korman v. Federal Housing AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API