Graham v. Sinclair
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Action by appellees for partition of real estate. There was judgment in their favor from which this appeal. The error presented that we need to consider is that the court erred in each of its conclusions of law. It appears by the special finding of facts that Austin Sinclair, and appellant were duly married February 28, 1905, and lived together as husband and wife until in September, 1921.
At and before their marriage, said Sinclair was the owner of the real estate here involved.
On June 18, 1907, he and appellant joined in a deed conveying the real estate to one Schroeder, trustee, the same to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harned's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Folwell v. FolwellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. HeldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Graham v. SinclairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929