Legal Opinion
United States v. Mayo
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided October 30, 1942No. 31PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONG, District Judge.
The United States is engaged in the distribution of fertilizer to the farmers of Florida and in other States as a part of a soil conserving program developed by the government to carry out the purposes of the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 590a et seq. The outline of the program is set out in the complaint filed herein, and the attached affidavits. The fertilizer is purchased by the government from commercial manufacturers, inspected by the government as to suitability for the purpose for which it is to be used. It is then shipped under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marino v. Town of RamapoNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Twin Falls County v. HulbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Fieger v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Marvec-All State, Inc. v. PurcellNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Federal Housing Commissioner v. ReeseCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.