Legal Opinion

Leff v. Board of Elections

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Gammerman v Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 57 NY2d 888, decided herewith).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the extraordinary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higby v. MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Rutter v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API