Legal Opinion

Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the defect of late filing is not curable for the reasons assigned.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higby v. MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Rutter v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Settineri v. DiCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Marchiselli v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Matter of Fuentes v. CatalanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. Leff v. Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API