Legal Opinion

Husband v. Target Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2026No. B342334Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/21/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE DANIEL HUSBAND, B342334 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22STCV34888) TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Thomas D. Long, Judge. Affirmed. DEN Labor Law, Daniel E. Nomanim, and Joseph S. Socher for Plaintiff and Appellant. Seyfarth Shaw, Mandana Massoumi, David J. Kim, and Phillip J. Ebsworth for Defendant and Respondent. ****** California’s Fair Employment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API