Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re C.T.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2016No. 15-0098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentJustice Guzman

In November 2013, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services removed a child .from the relators’ care and custody under an emergency order. More than two years later, the child remains in the Department’s custody even though the mandamus record is devoid of evidence supporting the limited statutory grounds allowing the Department to retain conservatorship following an emergency removal, and even though trial on the Department’s conservatorship petition did not commence before expiration of a statutorily mandated dismissal deadline applicable to Department-filed conservatorship…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In the Interest of E.C.R., ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. in the Interest of G v. III and G v. Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
  2. D. J. and A. S. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
  3. Werthwein v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API