Legal Opinion

In re Jennings

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2018No. 4 JD 14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE BARTON

This case considers charges that a Magisterial District Judge forced several constables who served arrest warrants and civil process from his judicial office to contribute a percentage of their remuneration to his reelection fund.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 14, 2014, the Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint against Magisterial District Judge Robert Jennings, III, alleging that then-Judge Jennings violated various provisions of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges and the Pennsylvania Constitution. These allegations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In Re SmithCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Eisenberg v. COM., DEPT. OF PUB. WEL.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. In re Act 147 of 1990Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re JenningsCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API