Legal Opinion

E. & H. T. Anthony & Co. v. Fox

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate an attachment on the papers upon which it was granted.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

This is a motion to vacate an attachment upon the papers on which it was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the affidavits. The plaintiff is a domestic corporation. The principal affidavit is made by Frederick A. Anthony, who swears that “ he is the secretary and treasurer of E. & H. T. Anthony & Co., the plaintiff in the above entitled action.” He also swears that the plaintiff is entitled to recover from the defendant the amount for the recovery of which the action is brought, “ over and above all counterclaims known to said plaintiff or to this deponent.” He further sets forth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manufacturers' National Bank v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barstow Stove Co. v. DarlingNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API