Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. State Corporation Com'n

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1966No. 7971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

Following an order of the State Corporation Commission denying its application to change the status of its station at Tularosa to a non-agency station, Southern Pacific Company has removed the cause to the Supreme Court under the provisions of Section 7, Art. XI of the State Constitution, providing, among other things, that:

“ * * * Any company, corporation or common carrier which does not comply with the order of the commission within the time limited therefor, may file with the commission a petition to remove such cause to the Supreme Court, and * * * the Supreme Court may,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denton Bros. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Petition of Town of GrenvilleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Randall v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Village and Citizens of Grenville v. State Corp. Com'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Denver & R. G. W. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of Missouri Pac. R. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API