Schenker v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentMurray, Chief Justice
I do not concur in the opinion of the majority and now give my reasons for my dissent.
The trial court makes it plain in its judgment that it holds that the district court does not have jurisdiction to hear a cause between a consumer or rate-payer of a municipally owned utility, though his property is being confiscated as a result of the City Council or some other body’s fixing gas and electric rates so high as to confiscate his property.
The majority readily admit that if the council of a home rule city fixes rates so low as to conficate the property of a utility company, that such utility…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Texarkana v. WigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- San Antonio Conservation Soc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Glen Oaks Utilities, Inc. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Glen Oaks Utilities, Inc. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Corpus Christi Ex Rel. Harris v. FlatoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.