Legal Opinion
Lutz v. De Laurentiis
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1989No. B029439PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1320Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Plaintiffs George and Kathleen Lutz, along with other individuals, commenced an action which essentially sounds in unfair competition. Their fourth amended complaint contained numerous counts in which they attempted to couch their claims in theories of tort, breach of contract and statutory violations.
As to many of the counts, the trial court sustained demurrers without leave to amend and entered judgments of dismissal. As to the remainder of the counts, the trial court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs have appealed.
Since we conclude that plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Barney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Rader Co. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Winchester Mystery House v. Global Asylum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Lutz v. De LaurentiisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.