Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Dreifus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Assumpsit by Walter G. Hogan against Charles Dreifus, Emanuel Dreifus, and Leopold E. Block, co-partners as Dreifus, Block & Company, on certain acceptances. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is upon five acceptances drawn in favor of the First National Bank of Chicago by the Columbian Exposition Salvage Company, of Chicago, 111., upon Dreifus, Block & Co., of Pittsburg, Pa., and accepted in writing by that company. They were all drawn in 1895, and accepted within a few days after their respective dates. The Columbian Exposition Salvage Company had an account with the First National Bank of Chicago, and discounted these acceptances with that bank, the proceeds being placed to the credit of that company. When these acceptances became due, they were duly protested for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hovey v. SebringMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Reynolds v. KentMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. McCreadyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Co. v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API