Legal Opinion

Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Canal Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for injunction ¡rendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

There appears to be no distinction in-principle between the plaintiff’s application for an injunction in this case and that of the plaintiff in Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v. Canal Board, 146 App. Div. 151; modified and affirmed in 204 N. Y. 471, where it was held that a railroad company *285was entitled, to a judgment restraining the defendants and their agents from trespassing upon or interfering with a railroad bridge over a stream used for and in the construction and improvement of the barge canal unless either the state constructs a new bridge and approaches thereto or appropriates for the canal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. . Canal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Canal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rumsey & Co. v. MayNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API