Legal Opinion

Rhoad v. Rhoad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1975No. [No. 91, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Petitioner, Robert D. Rhoad (the husband), sued his wife, Betty C. Rhoad (the wife), on June 15, 1973, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii on the nonculpatory ground then provided in Maryland Code (1957, 1973 Repl. Vol.) Art. 16, § 24 that the parties had “lived separate and apart without any cohabitation and without interruption for five years.” 1 The chancellor (Fairbanks, J.) found the husband entitled to a divorce. The wife, however, had requested alimony. After first stating that “the fault [lay] with [the wife] insofar as the dissolution of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moran v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Flanagan v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Simmont v. SimmontCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Jester v. JesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Turrisi v. SanzaroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Sody v. SodyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Quigley v. QuigleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Turrisi v. SanzaroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API