Legal Opinion

Beuter v. Dillon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Bill for Injunction, to restrain prosecution of a suit. Error to the Circuit Court of McLean County; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Pleasants

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

On July 1, 1889, W. H. Gilstrap borrowed of Albert Beuter, the deceased husband of plaintiff in error, the sum of five hundred dollars and delivered to him therefor a promissory note as follows:

“ $500. Bloomington, Ill., July 1, 1889.

One year after date we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Albert Beuter five hundred dollars at the National State Bank, Bloomington, Illinois, for value received, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date,” which was signed by the borrower and also by each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crossman v. WohllebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Dodgson v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bradshaw v. CombsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Warner v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Montague v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drescher v. FulhamColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Drescher v. FulhamColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Lancaster v. PrussingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API