Lancaster v. Prussing
Appellate Court of Illinois
Foreclosure. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Axel Chytbaus, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom
delivered the opinion of the court.
The arguments of counsel for plaintiffs in error are more ingenuous than appealing or convincing. Every proposition advanced for reversing the decree is fraught with extreme legal technicality, and much of the argument made in an attempt to solve these legal technicalities and adapt and make them applicable to the facts in the record, are sophistical, strained, and unnatural, and not at all in keeping with the conscionable administration of justice, or the application of equitable principles governing and controlling courts of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Haas v. Chicago Building SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Crone v. CroneIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Cox v. Mobile & Girard RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.