Legal Opinion

Zavala v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1977No. 48953PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Prior to October 10, 1969, section 8 — 102 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act did not require that a claimant provide the name and address of the treating hospital or hospitals. Effective that date, however, the section was amended to so require. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 85, par. 8 — 102.) Section 8 — 103 of that act provides, in pertinent part:

“If the notice under Section 8 — 102 is not served as provided therein, any such civil action commenced against a local public entity *** shall be dismissed and the person to whom such cause of injury [sic\ accrued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. King v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Zavala v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Rio v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. M. L. Ensminger Co. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Margolis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Lando v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API