Zavala v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran
Prior to October 10, 1969, section 8 — 102 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act did not require that a claimant provide the name and address of the treating hospital or hospitals. Effective that date, however, the section was amended to so require. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 85, par. 8 — 102.) Section 8 — 103 of that act provides, in pertinent part:
“If the notice under Section 8 — 102 is not served as provided therein, any such civil action commenced against a local public entity *** shall be dismissed and the person to whom such cause of injury [sic\ accrued…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reynolds v. City of TuscolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- King v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Dunbar v. ReiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Zavala v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
3Cited by20 opinions
- Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Rio v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- M. L. Ensminger Co. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Margolis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Lando v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.