Legal Opinion

Vimont v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Afjgeal from Pollc Circuit Court. The plaintiff appeals from an order remanding the cause to the federal court. The defendant appeals from an order overruling a motion made by the defendant to make one Johnson a party. The plaintiff perfected his appeal first.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

I. It seems proper to consider the question first which is presented by the defendant’s appeal. The action is brought by the plaintiff’, Yimont, as assignee of one O. O. Johnson, to recover for a personal injury alleged to have been sustained by the assignor by reason of the wrongful and negligent acts of the defendant.

1. practice: party ¡1 insfgnorin suit By assignee. The defendant moved that Johnson be made a party, but the court overruled the motion, and this constitutes the defendant’s ground of complaint. “When a ° 1 determination of the controversy between the Pai’ties before the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coal Co. v. BlatchfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Browne v. StrodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Knapp v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railroad v. AckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wells v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Sioux City v. Western Asphalt Paving Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Hawley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Wright Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API