Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 3, 1926PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Long, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error here, defendant in the lower court, was convicted upon an indictment charging him with the offense of carnal intercourse with unmarried female under the age of eighteen years.

The essential elements of this crime are, First, carnal intercourse; Second, the female must have been under the age of eighteen years; Third, she must have been umnar ried at the time of the carnal intercourse; Fourth, she must be of previous chaste character.

The assignments of error are directed to the proof to sustain three of these essential elements of the offense, viz:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Lanier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Gary G. Debaun v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. DeLaine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API