Legal Opinion

Hull & Smith Horse Vans, Inc. v. Carras

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1985No. Docket 78211PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the costs of transporting defendant’s racehorses on four separate occasions between 1978 and 1980. Plaintiff also sought recovery for the boarding of two of the horses in California for over two years following defendant’s refusal to pay the transportation charges. The jury found for plaintiff. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff of $20,797.85 with interest on February 28, 1984. On April 16, 1984, the court ordered defendant to pay plaintiff’s "actual costs”, including attorney fees, which were necessitated by defendant’s refusal of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  2. Carras v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Carras v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Holtzlander v. BrownellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API