State v. Prtine
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellant Andy William Prtine was convicted of first-degree felony murder for the stabbing death of Brent Ward. In this direct appeal, Prtine argues, in part, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney conceded in his closing argument without Prtine’s consent that Prtine intended to kill Ward. State v. Prtine, 784 N.W.2d 303, 317-18 (Minn.2010).1 We held that Prtine’s counsel conceded guilt with respect to the element of intent to kill during closing argument. Id. *596at 318. We retained jurisdiction over the appeal and remanded to the district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HarajliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015