Legal Opinion

Leonard Umina v. Luke Lumina

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 11, 2017No. 75577-3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FLED 00WIT-0F APPEALSIPV I STATE OF WASHINGTON 2017 SEP I I AM 10: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LEONARD UMINA, No. 75577-3-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE V. LUKE LUMINA, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondent. FILED: September 11, 2017 SPEARMAN, J. — Several legal and equitable doctrines serve to avoid inconsistency and protect the finality of judgments. Under the doctrine of res judicata, a party is barred from bringing a claim that was or could have been litigated in a previous action. The doctrine of judicial estoppel bars a party from gaining an advantage in a later…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Kuhlman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API