Legal Opinion
Smith v. Stilphen
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 17, 2004No. CIV.04-101-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DiCLERICO, District Judge.
Janet G. Stilphen has moved to dismiss the complaint of Rhonda and Mark Smith to the extent they seek to recover the earnings lost while caring for their son, Matthew, since he received permanent injuries in a collision between his bicycle and Stilphen’s van. Stilphen argues that, because Matthew was nineteen years old at the time he became disabled, his parents no longer had any duty to care for him and therefore have no right to recover any resulting lost income. The Smiths object.
Background
The following facts are drawn from the Smiths’ first amended…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boyle v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Rosemary Feliciano v. State of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ramonita Santiago De Castro v. Victor Morales MedinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. StilphenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004