Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stilphen

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided November 17, 2004No. CV-04-101-JDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Smith v . Stilphen CV-04-101-JD 11/17/04 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Rhonda Smith and Mark Smith v. Civil N o . 04-101 JD Opinion N o .

2004 DNH 162

Janet G. Stilphen O R D E R Janet G. Stilphen has moved to dismiss the complaint of Rhonda and Mark Smith to the extent they seek to recover the earnings lost while caring for their son, Matthew, since he received permanent injuries in a collision between his bicycle and Stilphen’s van. Stilphen argues that, because Matthew was nineteen years old at the time he became disabled, his parents no longer had any duty…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Rosemary Feliciano v. State of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Ronald WoodrumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Hernando Robinson, United States of America v. Jorge Robinson, United States of America v. Roberto RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API