Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Verchofsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

It is contended that the decree in this case should be reversed, because, first, the chief issue under the creditor’s bill and the intervening petitions relates to the charge of fraud. It is alleged that the quit-claim deed from Mrs. Friedman to Mr. Hirsch, and the warranty deed from Mr. Flirsch and wife to the daughters of Mrs. Friedman were fraudulent as to creditors.

The chancellor who tried this case, heard the witnesses in open court. The evidence taken is voluminous and is sharply conflicting. The court having seen and heard the witnesses, was in a better position than we to judge of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fabrice v. Von Der BrelieIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Phelps v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. VanVleet v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sherman v. LuckhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. House v. SchnadigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Spencer v. Santoki JiroDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API