Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Luckhardt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1903No. 12,643PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Morris district court; O. L. Moorb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J. :

This case is before us upon rehearing. It has again been fully briefed and argued. The facts will be found stated in the former opinion of this court, 65 Kan. 610, 70 Pac. 702. The law there declared reads:

“A preferential payment by a debtor to one of his creditors, within four months prior to the former’s bankruptcy, is not void under clause b, section 60, and clause e, section 67 (30 U. S. Stat. atL., ch. 541), of the bankruptcy act of 1898, though made with a fraudulent intent on the debtor’s part, if it be accepted by the creditor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swarts v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. In re GutwilligCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
  3. Frisbie v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. Friedman v. VerchofskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Gamble v. ElkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Irving Trust Co. v. Chase Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Richardson v. Germania BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Edward Hines Western Pine Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  4. King v. KlempNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Wright v. SampterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API