Legal Opinion

Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co. v. Huppe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1915No. 8297PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Boulder District Court. Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

For convenience we will designate the Greeley & Love-land Irrigation Company plaintiff, and defendants in error defendants. At the first adjudication,' in 1883, in the District Court of Boulder county settling the relative priorities of ditches for irrigation upon the Thompson river — water district No. 4 — decrees were entered awarding the Louden ditch 194 cubic feet, and the Handy ditch 172 cubic feet, of water per second. In 1890 another adjudication was had in this water district by which the priorities of reservoirs for direct storage from the river were settled as follows: Lone Tree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Lake Supply Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Finley v. Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Handy Ditch Co. v. Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Holbrook Irrigation District v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API