Legal Opinion

Haykl v. Drees

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

A car owned by defendant Weissgerber and driven by defendant Drees collided with another car operated by defendant Jensen in which plaintiff Sophie Haykl was a passenger. The passenger was injured and she and her father sued all the named defendants. Defendant Jensen defaulted in appearance. Decision upon a motion made on the trial by Granger -& Co. for a dismissal of the complaint and a direction of a verdict was reserved and the case left to the jury. The jury found for plaintiff against all the defendants, and the aforesaid motions and a motion in the alternative for a new trial, all made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Matter of Litts v. . Risley Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Wescott v. Henshaw Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People ex rel. Feinberg v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. Cerp Construction Co. v. J. J. Cleary, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dunne v. ContentiNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API