Legal Opinion

Dunne v. Contenti

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained by her when struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant Contenti.

In plaintiff’s complaint it was alleged that at the time of the accident the defendant Contenti was employed by the corporate defendant, and was about the business of such defendant, and was using his automobile in and for the business of the corporate defendant. These allegations were not denied.

An allegation that the automobile was, at the time of the accident, under the control of the defendant John Hancock Company was denied, but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. American National Insurance v. DenkeTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunne v. ContentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API