Mitchell v. Hughes
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, French; J., entered January 14, 1918, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action in tort, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was brought by respondents, who are-husband and wife, to recover for personal injuries received by the respondent wife on or about the 3d day of December, 1916.
The facts admitted or fairly established by the evidence are substantially as follows: The respondent wife was employed in Seattle, her husband being employed near Renton, and their child living with its grandmother in Maple Valley, all in King county, Washington. On the date mentioned, Charles McCoy, who was a friend of the family and who lived in Maple Valley, informed the respondent Elizabeth E. Mitchell that he intended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Murphy v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Caffinni v. HermannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
- Daingerfield v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helgeson Ex Rel. Helgeson v. PowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Malone v. HowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- City of Tacoma v. HoustonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Sennett v. ZimmermanWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.