Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Katleman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1994No. S033705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.4th 666 (1994)

881 P.2d 1083

34 Cal. Rptr.2d 386

ARTHUR J. CROWLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CAROLE KATLEMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. S033705.

Supreme Court of California.

October 31, 1994.

COUNSEL

Crowley & Cuneo, Sarah J. Hoover and Arthur J. Crowley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hufstedler, Kaus & Ettinger, John Sobieski, Dennis M. Perluss and Mark R. McDonald for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

In Bertero v. National General Corp. (1974) 13 Cal.3d 43 [118 Cal. Rptr. 184, 529 P.2d 608, 65 A.L.R.3d 878] (Bertero), we held that a suit for malicious prosecution…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. GrumetSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PS) Sharma v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1District Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API