Legal Opinion

Stout v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1967No. 40852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of a forged instrument in writing; the punishment, three years.

Trial was before the court upon appellant’s plea of guilty, a jury having been waived under the provisions of Art. 1.13 of the Vernon’s Ann.Code of Criminal Procedure.

At the trial, the appellant, while testifying as a witness, made a judicial confession to the offense charged and testified that on the date alleged he knowingly possessed the forged instrument in writing, being a check introduced in evidence as state’s exhibit #1, for the purpose of passing the same as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Erwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Fifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Blanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API