Stout v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DICE, Judge.
The conviction is for the unlawful possession of a forged instrument in writing; the punishment, three years.
Trial was before the court upon appellant’s plea of guilty, a jury having been waived under the provisions of Art. 1.13 of the Vernon’s Ann.Code of Criminal Procedure.
At the trial, the appellant, while testifying as a witness, made a judicial confession to the offense charged and testified that on the date alleged he knowingly possessed the forged instrument in writing, being a check introduced in evidence as state’s exhibit #1, for the purpose of passing the same as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Erwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Fifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Blanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975