Legal Opinion

Ault v. Hurley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 31, § 39. No oral testimony was heard. The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, which in substance was a case stated. Frati v. Jannini, 226 Mass. 430.

The respondent stopped the pay of the petitioner as an employee of Fall River on the ground that he was illegally employed.

*177The point in issue is whether his employment in preference to Albert Nadeau and Michael Clarke, when there was a lack of funds to employ all three, was in violation of the seniority preference in the labor service provided by Civil Service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. McDonald v. City Manager of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Tremblay v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnard v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Goss v. District Court of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API