Legal Opinion
Fannie Harrison v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 15, 1997No. 95-1300PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a civil suit based on diversity jurisdiction brought by appellee, Fannie Harrison (“Harrison”), against appellant, Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (“Nissan”), seeking damages for alleged defects in the 1994 Nissan Sentra that Harrison purchased on July 11, 1994. Nissan moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to “first resort” to the informal dispute resolution procedure provided by Nissan pursuant to the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law, 73 P.S. § 1951 et seq. (Purdon 1993). The district court denied the motion, and also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- In Re American Homestar of Lancaster, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Brown & Root, Incorporated v. Warren J. Breckenridge Charles Lee BookerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.