Legal Opinion

Nauni v. Cannon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1981No. Nos. 0-81-237 and 0-81-238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNISH, Judge:

The principal issues involved in these proceedings are:

I

Was minimal due process afforded the petitioner in the ex parte order revoking her bond on March 31, 1981, and at the subsequent April 6, 1C81, hearing?

II

Should the respondent, Judge Joe Cannon, have disqualified himself?

III

Did both respondents err in denying the petitioner a transcript at State expense in derogation of this Court’s Order of January 20, 1981?

The petitioner was convicted in Oklahoma County District Court Case No. CRF-79-3719 for First Degree Manslaughter and in Case No. CRF — 79-3717 for Shooting…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kordelski v. CookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Opinion No. (2000), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2000
  2. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API